In this article Subdivision & Strata Certifier, Gordon Wren, discusses what a Strata Certifier is, and when you should appoint one.
Firstly, a Strata Certifier can issue a strata certificate for a Strata Plan. This then allows the Strata Plan to be lodged at the Land Titles Office for registration. A strata certificate can be issued by a strata certifier or the local Council. A Strata Certifier is accredited by the NSW Government through the Building Professionals Board (the Board). The list of accredited Strata Certifiers can be found on its website: www.bpb.nsw.gov.au. On its list, Strata Certifiers are given a category named “D1”.
Secondly, in my experience there has been some confusion about whether the appointed Strata Certifier is a PCA (Principal Certifying Authority). The Strata Certifier when acting in the role to issue a strata certificate is not a PCA. A PCA is an Accredited Certifier that issues an occupation certificate (ie building certifier) or a subdivision certificate where there are subdivision construction works to be carried (ie subdivision certificate).
Another area of confusion I have encountered is the applicant understanding the difference between a subdivision certificate and strata certificate.
A subdivision certificate allows a Deposited Plan prepared by a registered land surveyor to be lodged at the Land Titles Office for registration. This plan is for the subdivision of land. The subdivision certificate is issued by a subdivision certifier (a category “B1” on the BPB website). The issuing of a subdivision certificate is governed by the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act (EP & A Act).
As I mentioned before, a strata certificate allows a Strata Plan prepared by a registered land surveyor to be lodged at the Land Titles Office for registration. The titles in the Strata Plan are for defined cubic spaces within or adjacent to a building. The issuing of a strata certificate is governed by the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act or Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act.
The advice that I give to applicants is that it is good practice to appoint a Strata Certifier when you “start to dig the hole”. I give this advice, because once a hole has started to be dug for the project, the DA has issued, the Construction Certificate has been issued, and in my experience, the developer/builder then concentrates on the building works, and may not revisit all the DA conditions until the end of the project.
In my experience, there may be certain DA conditions that could be amended, but if these conditions are flagged at the end of the project, there is no time to request any amendments through a Sec 96 modification. Any Sec 96 modifications would be best applied for well before the end of a project.
There have been many instances where an applicant has applied for a strata certificate at the end of the project, only to be advised by the strata certifier that there is no development consent for strata subdivision for their project. This can result in very costly delays. With recent amendments to the SEPP (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) [also known as the Codes SEPP], strata subdivision can be complying development under certain conditions. This means that a suitably Accredited Certifier (with B1 category), can issue a complying development certificate (CDC) for strata subdivision. If a CDC can be issued, then a development consent from Council for strata subdivision will not be needed.
Generally, the conditions are:
a) The building DA is less than 5 years old
b) The project is not a dual occupancy
c) There are no heritage issues
If the applicant appoints the Strata Certifier early, then costly delays incurred by applying for a Council development consent at the end of the project can be avoided.
There have been many examples where badly worded conditions, or unnecessary conditions, have not been addressed and deleted at the start of the project. Once again the applicant can be faced with costly delays. These delays do not only equate to additional financial holding charges, but also risk purchaser contracts being rescinded due to time overruns.
One such condition some Councils impose is that a final occupation certificate is required to be issued before a strata certificate can be issued. This requirement could add an unnecessary delay of up to four (4) to six (6) weeks to a project. This condition should be deleted by a Sec 96 modification. This has been reinforced by Practice Advice issued by the Building Professional Board in its Bulletin, Issue 18, Nov 2009:
“A number of Councils are imposing conditions on the development consent for strata subdivision requiring the completion of associated building works prior to the issue of a strata certificate.
The Board’s view is that an occupation certificate is the appropriate mechanism for ensuring the building work is completed and suitable for occupation and that the strata certificate should not perform this role.”
Once again, if the applicant contacts the Strata Certifier at the end of a project, there simply is not enough time to try a Sec 96 modification to remove unnecessary conditions.
I hope this discussion contributes to a smooth and efficient process for the strata certification in a project you may be involved with.
Subdivision & Strata Certifier